A rough idea of what you want to build is enough. The more detailed your brief, the lower the final price — agents work more precisely with fewer iterations. I always work from written specifications, since they can go directly into the AI agent context.

A written spec goes directly into the AI agent context — the output is more precise, without the information loss that comes from paraphrasing a phone conversation. You also keep it as a reference throughout the project. Calls are reserved for the initial intro or key decisions.

Security is a dedicated role in the orchestration — a security agent reviews the output of other agents and hunts for common vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, auth bypass, IDOR, CSRF, and others). For applications that may be attack targets, I additionally deploy a local uncensored model for penetration testing.

Yes. Based on your brief I'll create a free video walkthrough of a working demo build — no commitment, no payment upfront. Just describe what you want to build.

Small to medium-sized systems with their own logic — applications with a database, users, integrations, and an API. If you need a simple brochure site or business card page, I'd honestly recommend Wix or a similar tool — my rates simply wouldn't be justified for something that simple.

Yes, always. The finished software is yours — I hand over the repository, documentation, and deployment instructions. Your in-house team or another developer can maintain it going forward.

Yes — any maintenance or changes after delivery are billed at my standard hourly rate.

Delivering a working application that matches the agreed specification is my responsibility. Because all communication happens in writing, there's always a clear record of what was discussed and agreed — which is one of the main reasons I prefer text over calls. If something doesn't align with the spec, I fix it.

Yes, absolutely — but it's far better to include everything in the initial specification. Each additional feature requires me to invest time preparing the right context for the AI agents, which is billed at my hourly rate. A thorough brief upfront is always cheaper than adding features piecemeal after delivery.

Both are possible. Code handover is simpler and faster. Full deployment involves additional time billed at my hourly rate — I'm currently building AI-powered deployment automation that will streamline this process further.

Mobile app development is planned — I expect to support it fully from August 2026.

Source code rarely contains data sensitive enough to be a real concern, and using models via API key means your data is not used to train those models. That said, if you don't trust that claim or your project is under NDA with sensitive domain logic, I also offer fully local development — connecting the agents to a local LLM running on dedicated hardware. In that case, you should expect a longer delivery timeline.

The agents operate under strict quality rules. If the testing agent isn't satisfied with a given feature, the cycle repeats — the implementation is continuously revised and improved until it passes. Only around 10% of iterations are accepted by the tester on the first pass. This feedback loop is what fundamentally sets the quality bar apart from other software development tools.